ReviewCureus2025
Cybersecurity in Healthcare: New Threat to Patient Safety.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Machine Learning-Driven Cybersecurity Solutions in Health Care: Scoping Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Supply Chain Vulnerabilities in First-Line Treatments for Sexually Transmitted Infections: Implications for U.S. Public Health Preparedness.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Hybrid feature selection for IoMT based intrusion detection system for integrating mutual information filtering with deep learning based accelerated metaheuristic optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cybersecurity awareness among radiography teachers in Africa and its potential impact in the digital age of medicine.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Navigating Liability in Virtual Care: Risk Management Strategies for Physicians in a Rapidly Evolving Landscape.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid integration of technology into healthcare systems has brought significant improvements in patient care and operational efficiency, but it has also introduced new cybersecurity challenges. This manuscript explores the evolving landscape of cybersecurity risks in healthcare, with a focus on their potential impact on patient safety and the strategies to mitigate these threats. The rise of interconnected systems, electronic health records (EHRs), and Internet of things (IoT) devices has made safeguarding patient data and healthcare processes increasingly complex. Notable cyber incidents, such as the Anthem Blue Cross breach and the WannaCry ransomware attack, highlight the real-world consequences of these vulnerabilities. The review also examines emerging technologies like AI, cloud computing, telehealth, and wearables, considering their potential benefits and security risks. Best practices for improving healthcare cybersecurity are discussed, including regulatory compliance, risk assessment, data encryption, employee training, and incident response planning. Ultimately, the manuscript emphasizes the ethical responsibility of healthcare organizations to prioritize cybersecurity, ensuring a balance between innovation and security to protect patient data, uphold regulatory standards, and maintain the integrity of healthcare services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.