ReviewCureus2025
Evaluating the Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation in Emergency and Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Recent Advances in Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the accuracy and effectiveness of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for peripheral intravenous (PIV) line placement in trauma and emergency department patients. PIV access can be challenging in patients with difficult vascular access (DIVA), often leading to delays in care. POCUS has emerged as a promising modality to improve success rates and reduce complications in such scenarios. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Five studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing randomized controlled trials, observational studies, a quality improvement initiative, and a meta-analysis, with a combined total of over 2,800 patients. The findings consistently demonstrated that POCUS significantly improves first-attempt success rates, decreases the number of cannulation attempts, and enhances procedural efficiency. One randomized trial reported a faster median cannulation time with bi-plane imaging (35 seconds vs. 45 seconds, p = 0.03), while a meta-analysis showed a two-fold increase in the odds of first-pass success using ultrasound guidance (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.65-2.7; p < 0.001). Nurse-led POCUS training programs also proved highly effective, achieving post-training success rates above 90%. Despite some limitations, such as heterogeneity in study design, small sample sizes, and mixed pediatric and adult populations, the overall evidence supports the integration of POCUS into emergency protocols for vascular access. The results suggest that routine POCUS use can improve outcomes and workflow, particularly in time-sensitive trauma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.