ReviewCureus2025
The Neurological Sequelae of Vitamin B12 Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Randomized Controlled Trial.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable AI reveals temporal risk pathways in fall prediction: Extracting clinical insights from multi-horizon machine learning models.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Vitamins and Human Health: 3rd Edition Editorial.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Micronutrient risk with GLP-1 receptor and dual incretin agonists in obesity: Mechanistic pathways, clinical signals, and a monitoring framework.Obesity pillars · 2026Review
- Vitamin B Supplementation for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Skin Hyperpigmentation: An Under-Recognized Dermatological Clue to Vitamin B12 Deficiency.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Oxidative stress and DNA damage profile in cord blood of vitamin B12-deficient newborns.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Correlation between vitamin B12 levels and peripheral neuropathy in diabetic patients.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Diabetic impact on the neuroaxis: from peripheral neuropathy to central neurodegeneration.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin B12 deficiency is a well-recognized cause of neurological complications, including peripheral neuropathy, cognitive decline, and myelopathy. However, the extent of neurological benefits from supplementation, especially in subclinical cases, remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the neurological effects of vitamin B12 supplementation. The review focused on treatment outcomes, route of administration, and population characteristics, along with the methodological quality of included studies. Ten RCTs were included, involving individuals with clinical and subclinical vitamin B12 deficiency. Supplementation improved neurological symptoms in patients with overt deficiency, with oral therapy showing similar efficacy to intramuscular injections, better tolerability, and lower cost. In older adults with subclinical deficiency, supplementation did not significantly improve cognitive or neurological outcomes. In diabetic patients with neuropathy, improvements were noted in symptom scores, but not in objective neurological measures. Although reductions in homocysteine levels were observed, these biochemical changes did not consistently correlate with clinical improvements. Vitamin B12 supplementation is effective for patients with clinical deficiency but shows limited neurological benefit in subclinical cases. Further trials using standardized outcomes and longer follow-up are needed to refine treatment strategies and support biomarker-guided approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.