Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486304›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Predicting the Presence of Intra-abdominal Adhesions in Pregnant Women Undergoing a Repeat Cesarean Section by Assessing the Ultrasound Sliding Sign: A Prospective Observational Study.

Nallaballe Shalini, Shailaja Bidri, Ravi Kumar Yeli, Rajasri G Yaliwal, Aruna Biradar, Preeti S Malapure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nallaballe ShaliniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (BLDE) (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Shailaja BidriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (BLDE) (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Ravi Kumar YeliDepartment of Radiology, Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (BLDE) (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Rajasri G YaliwalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (BLDE) (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Aruna BiradarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (BLDE) (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.
Preeti S MalapureDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Bijapur Lingayat District Educational Association (BLDE) (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Cesarean section (CS) is a common obstetric procedure, with repeat CS increasing the risk of intra-abdominal adhesions, leading to surgical complications. The ultrasound sliding sign has been proposed as a non-invasive tool to predict adhesions, but its diagnostic accuracy remains under evaluation. This study aims to assess the accuracy of the ultrasound sliding sign in predicting intra-abdominal adhesions in repeat CS cases and evaluate its correlation with intraoperative findings. Methodology A prospective observational study was conducted at BLDE (D.U.) Shri B.M. Patil Medical College from May 2023 to December 2024, including 200 women undergoing repeat CS. Preoperative ultrasound evaluated the sliding sign, classifying cases as positive (free uterine movement, no adhesions) or negative (restricted movement, adhesions). Intraoperative findings were recorded for correlation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Among the participants, 40% had adhesions. The ultrasound sliding sign demonstrated 86.1% sensitivity, 85.8% specificity, 77.5% positive predictive value, and 91.6% negative predictive value. Adhesions were significantly associated with maternal age (>30 years), parity (≥2), higher body mass index, and multiple previous CSs. Conclusions The ultrasound sliding sign is a reliable, non-invasive tool for predicting intra-abdominal adhesions in repeat CS, aiding in surgical preparedness. Given its high diagnostic accuracy, it can enhance clinical decision-making; however, further studies are needed to refine its application.

Indexed as

cesarean sectionintra-abdominal adhesionsmaternal outcomesnon-invasive diagnosticsrepeat csultrasound sliding sign

Identifiers

PMID40486304
PMCPMC12143109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.