ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2025
Camaraderie: Profession-Specific Facilitated Small Groups to Improve Well-Being in Health Care.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of profession-specific small groups for physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and managers led by trained peer facilitators with the intention to improve aspects of well-being. Participants and Methods: This is a single-center, pilot, nonrandomized control trial of the Camaraderie group intervention with employees at Oregon Health and Science University (N=151; intervention, n=89; control, n=62). The intervention condition included 8 groups of 10 to 12 participants and 2 facilitators. Groups met 6 times for a 1-hour virtual session during a 3-month period from March to May 2023. Each session had a theme and 2 prompts. Participants were surveyed prior to the first session, immediately after the 6 sessions, and then 3 months after the program concluded. Validated metrics assessed included burnout, belonging, job satisfaction, and perceived stress levels. Results: After completing the 6 sessions, 72.5% of intervention participants reported attending 5 or 6 of the 6 sessions, and 86.0% rated the facilitation as above average or highest value. Belonging on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (strong agreement) had a statistically significant increase of +0.45 (mean change or difference-in-difference; Conclusion: Profession-specific facilitated virtual small groups provide a high-impact experience with a minimal time commitment and support the well-being and belonging of the health care workforce.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.