ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Management of multiple non-magnetic intraocular and intraorbital foreign bodies following a motor vehicle accident: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Analysis of Perforating Globe Injuries with Intraorbital Foreign Bodies: An 18-Year Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a rare case of multiple non-magnetic intraocular and intraorbital foreign bodies (IOFBs) resulting from a motor vehicle accident. A 29-year-old male presented with sudden vision loss and pain in his right eye after windshield fragments penetrated the eye. Initial examination revealed severe visual impairment. Emergency and subsequent staged surgical interventions were performed to remove multiple glass-like foreign bodies, repair retinal detachment, and ultimately restore visual acuity. Three months after extensive procedures, best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved to 0.2. This case report is crucial as it presents a rare instance of a patient with open-globe injury and multiple non-magnetic IOFBs achieving good visual outcomes despite complex procedures. It underscores the importance of thorough evaluation, phased surgery, and multidisciplinary teamwork in managing such cases, while also indicating the associated difficulties, thereby offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making and future research on severe ocular traumas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.