ArticleJHLT open2025
The approach to placement of a continuous-flow intracorporeal ventricular assist device in small left ventricle.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The HeartMate 3 (HM3) has become among the most widely utilized durable left ventricular (LV) assist devices (LVAD) owing to reduced rates of pump thrombosis, bleeding, and stroke. One limitation of the HM3 is its large size, which poses a challenge for implantation in smaller LVs. Herein, we describe a novel technique for durable LVAD implantation in patients with a small LV. Methods: Patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation from January 2020 to August 2024 were included in this study. The modified technique involved excision of the mitral valve (MV) and associated apparatus to create room for the LVAD inflow. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included rates of postoperative complications and hemodynamic parameters. Patient follow-up was until September 2024. Results: Eleven patients were included in this study. All patients received an HM3. The median preoperative LV end-diastolic diameter was 5.1 cm. The median total time on LVAD was 149 days, and overall mortality was 27.2% occurring a median of 204 days post-LVAD implantation. Four patients (36.4%) underwent heart transplantation and 4 (36.4%) were alive on LVAD at last follow-up. Proportions of morbidity included readmission for heart failure ( Conclusions: The small LV has been a significant challenge for durable LVAD insertion and is often considered a contraindication. A modified approach to LVAD insertion, including excision of the MV and associated apparatus and alignment of the LVAD inflow cannula with the MV orifice, allows for LVAD implantation in patients with a small LV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.