ReviewJHLT open2025
Pharmacodynamics monitoring after lung transplantation.
Review in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defining the optimal dosage of immunosuppressive drugs remains a significant challenge for solid organ transplant recipients, particularly for lung transplant recipients, who face an increased risk of infection. In these patients, it is crucial to carefully balance immunosuppression to ensure efficacy, prevent rejection, and minimize toxicity. Although the limitations of therapeutic drug monitoring have been widely discussed, pharmacodynamics monitoring has not reached the clinical practice. This review aims to evaluate the various methodologies available for monitoring the effects of immunosuppression in individual patients. While the initial focus was on directly assessing the impact of immunosuppressive treatments, we found limited evidence in this area. Instead, much of the available research is focused on predicting specific outcomes and indirectly assessing immunosuppression needs in lung transplant recipients. In this review, we provide an overview of the different methodologies that can be utilized to enhance the personalization of immunosuppressive therapy following lung transplantation. These include enzymatic monitoring, T-cell mediated functional assays, monitoring of lymphocyte subsets, gene expression profiling, and viral load measurements. Each of these approaches may contribute to a more tailored and effective immunosuppressive strategy for lung transplant recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.