ArticleJHLT open2025
The length of the warm ischemic interval in lung donation after circulatory death does not impact post-transplantation outcomes.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Regional Variation in Transplant Utilization and Agonal Times among Donation after Circulatory Death Lung Donors in the United States.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
- Resilience of lung grafts to warm ischemia: assessment byTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Lung Transplant Surgery: Where Do We Stand?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Transplantation of lungs obtained by donation after circulatory death (DCD) has increased the number of available organs. This study aims to determine how donor characteristics and current procurement processes (specifically, agonal and warm ischemic times) influence the outcomes experienced by the recipients of DCD lung transplants. Materials and Methods: An analysis was conducted on United Network for Organ Sharing data collected from January 2018 to June 30, 2024, with a focus on adult recipients of double lung transplants with a DCD donor. Withdrawal-to-flush and agonal-to-flush times were divided into three non-overlapping intervals. Univariable comparisons were performed on donor and recipient characteristics and post-transplantation outcomes between intervals. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine the impact of agonal and warm ischemic times on posttransplant survival. Results: The median times for withdrawal-to-flush and agonal-to-flush were 28 and 25 minutes, respectively, with closely aligned intervals. Donors in the short agonal-to-flush category were generally older and tended to be female, with no other significant donor characteristics associated with the time intervals. There were no observed associations between agonal or warm ischemic times and post-transplant outcomes, including primary graft dysfunction, ventilator dependency, and acute rejection. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant differences in survival between the groups (p=0.47 for withdrawal-to-flush; p=0.57 for agonal-to-flush). Conclusions: This study suggests that current variations in withdrawal-to-flush and agonal-to-flush times are not associated with DCD lung transplant outcomes. The findings underscore the need for expanding strategies to increase the utilization and availability of DCD lungs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.