ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Impact of rescuer position, arm angle, and anthropometric variables on muscle fatigue during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an international multicentric randomized crossover simulation study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standing chest compressions: simulation-based development and evaluation of a clinically applicable height adjustment approach.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- A function-based framework for AI-amplified, data-driven healthcare simulation research.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Considerations on multi-dimensional optimization of the CPR muscle fatigue mechanism.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Conducting multicenter simulation-based experimental research: lessons drawn from the QResuscitation plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of studies using surface electromyography (sEMG) to objectively assess the impact of rescuer position and arm angle on muscle fatigue during CPR. Additionally, the relationship between anthropometric variables (height and weight) and muscle fatigue remains underexplored. Aim: This study aims to objectively assess muscle fatigue during CPR by analyzing Methods: This international, multicentric, randomized crossover simulation trial included healthcare professionals assigned to one of four rescuer positions: kneeling on the floor, standing, standing on a step stool, and kneeling on a bed. Participants performed two 3-minute trials of continuous CCs at 90° and 105° arm angles. Muscle fatigue was assessed via sEMG, while compression quality was evaluated using manikin-derived data. Results: A total of 72 participants were included. The 105° arm angle significantly increased muscle fatigue compared to 90° (p < 0.001) across all rescuer positions. Taller and heavier rescuers exhibited lower fatigue for both arm angles (p < 0.05); however, fatigue levels were consistently higher at 105° than at 90°. Conclusion: Arm angle is a key determinant of rescuer muscle fatigue, with 105° increasing fatigue compared to 90°. Rescuer position alone was not significant, though fatigue was more pronounced in kneeling and elevated positions. Taller and heavier rescuers demonstrated greater endurance but remained affected by suboptimal arm angles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.