Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40486070›Full record

ArticleBJR open2025

Understanding the variation of modern endoscopic ultrasound use in patients with oesophageal cancer (VALUE): protocol for a multi-methods study.

Kieran G Foley, Cherish Boxall, James Franklin, Andrew Cook, Tim Underwood, Gareth Griffiths, Kelly Cozens, Katherine Bradbury, Margaret Fay, David Chuter and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06440174 (Understanding the Variation of Modern Endoscopic Ultrasound Use in Patients With Oesophageal Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06440174 recruitingnot on this map

Understanding the Variation of Modern Endoscopic Ultrasound Use in Patients With Oesophageal Cancer (VALUE): a Multi-methods Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustRan2024 to 2026Enrolled160ConditionsOesophageal CancerArmsendoscopic ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kieran G FoleyDivision of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-1759
Cherish BoxallCancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
James FranklinInstitute of Medical Imaging and Visualisation, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, BH12 5BB, United Kingdom.
Andrew CookCancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6680-439X
Tim UnderwoodSchool of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Gareth GriffithsCancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Kelly CozensCancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Katherine BradburyCancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Margaret FayPatient Representative, United Kingdom.
David ChuterPatient Representative, United Kingdom.
Kerry-Ann LongmanCancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Ben LindfieldCancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.
Chris HurtCancer Research UK Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Over 9000 patients are diagnosed with oesophageal cancer annually in the United Kingdom (UK). Decision-making about treatment options is influenced by radiological staging, which may include computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The use of EUS varies considerably around the UK and, since the introduction of PET-CT, the added value of EUS has been questioned. The VALUE study aims to understand this variation and determine how often and why EUS changes treatment decisions. VALUE will also evaluate patient and clinician experiences and opinions of EUS. Methods: This is a prospective, observational study investigating EUS in oesophageal cancer staging. Patients will be recruited at up to eleven sites in the UK, where they will be consented (if eligible) and registered onto iMedidata RAVE. Clinical and demographic data, TNM staging, pre and post EUS treatment decisions, and complications will be collected. We will attempt to sample patients from ethnic minority backgrounds in the study population, as they are underrepresented in research. Up to 30 patients and 30 clinicians will be interviewed to evaluate the use of EUS and experiences of both patient and clinician. The primary endpoint is the proportion of cases that EUS changes treatment decisions. Secondary endpoints include identification of factors that clinicians' and patients consider when deciding if EUS should be used, the time from diagnosis to treatment decision before and after EUS, and the reasons why EUS changed management. The study has been registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06440174. The trial is open to recruitment. Results: In total, 180 patients with potentially curable oesophageal cancer who are suitable for EUS will participate. Recruitment is currently planned until September 2025 and study results will be reported after June 2026. Conclusion: The VALUE study will enable a better understanding of how and why EUS is used in oesophageal cancer. This research will identify important factors that clinicians and patients consider when deciding EUS use and determine the frequency that EUS changes treatment decisions in the modern staging pathway. Advances in knowledge: The VALUE study is a prospective, multi-centre observational study investigating the use of EUS in the modern era of oesophageal cancer staging. The study aims to determine how often and why EUS changes treatment decisions. A qualitative component will explore both clinician and patient attitudes towards EUS.

Indexed as

diagnosisendoscopic ultrasoundimagingmanagementmetastasesoesophageal neoplasmqualitativestaging

Identifiers

PMID40486070
PMCPMC12145170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.