ArticleJHLT open2025
One-year clinical outcomes of an observational study of static lung preservation at 10° centigrade and semi-elective lung transplantation.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended static preservation of donor lungs at 10°C and early post-transplant outcomes: Experience from a center in the US.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Lung Transplant Surgery: Where Do We Stand?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Lung transplantation (LTx) is performed as soon as donor organs are made available to minimize cold ischemic time. Studies have suggested that an extended static preservation of donor lung allografts at 10°C may offer similar clinical outcomes with the added benefits of surgery being performed as a semi-elective (SE) procedure. The purpose of our study was to compare the clinical outcomes between a cohort of patients who underwent LTx in the traditional fashion and after a period of static preservation at 10°C. Unlike previous studies, we also provide an account of the recipients' pre-transplant health status. Methods: This is a prospective, nonrandomized, open label study with propensity matching. Controls were matched using a 2:1 greedy matching algorithm based on LAS within the timeframe of the study (2021-2023), resulting in 15 SE and 30 matched controls. In the SE arm, no LTx was performed between 1800 and 0500 hours. When donor lungs were accepted and the donor cross clamp time occurred between 1800 and 0400 hours, OR time (anesthesia start) was moved to 0600 or later. On arrival, donor lungs were stored at 10°C static preservation. The maximum allowed time between donor cross clamp and recipient anesthesia initiation was 12 hours. Results: No statistical difference between baseline characteristics was identified between the 2 groups (Table 1). 2/3 of patients were already admitted at the time of transplantation and 15% were on ECMO pre-operatively, indicating a sick patient cohort. Left lung ischemic time (performed second at our institution) was significantly longer in the SE group (722 minutes vs 318 minutes). Post-operative outcomes, including PGD at 72 hours, prolonged MV, ICU and hospital LOS, rejection, re-exploration, and re-admissions were not statistically different between the 2 groups. 1- year survival was 93% for SE patients, and 100% for controls. Conclusion: One-year outcomes of semi-elective lung transplantation is comparable to traditional transplantation recipients, even in a sick cohort of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.