ArticleGerontology2025
Electrocardiographic markers in Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome.
Article in Gerontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Presence of cardiovascular disease is linked to the prevalence and incidence of Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome (MCR), a pre-dementia syndrome characterized by cognitive complaints and slow gait. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) may offer a cost-effective, non-invasive, and reliable method for detecting cardiovascular abnormalities in individuals with MCR. This approach can not only diagnose cardiovascular disease but also facilitate timely interventions to prevent further cognitive decline in MCR cases. Methods: We examined the association of ECG abnormalities with prevalent MCR in 451 older adults with ECGs participating in the Kerala Einstein Study (KES), based in Indian state of Kerala. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex were used to examine associations, and reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: ECG abnormalities were present in 191 (42.4%) participants. Of the 43 participants diagnosed with MCR, 23 (53.5%) had ECG abnormalities. Abnormal Q waves (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.7-14.9) and heart block (OR 6.0, 95% CI 2.1-17.4) were more common in individuals with MCR compared to controls. There were no statistically significant group differences in the prevalence of other ECG abnormalities. Conclusion: ECG abnormalities are common in MCR patients, and can be considered for cardiovascular disease risk-stratification in MCR cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.