ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Comparison of Color Stability of a Monochromatic Resin Versus Bulk-Fill and Micro-Hybrid Resins.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Color Stability and Translucency of Five High-Translucent Resin Composites.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Impact of polyphenol-rich beverages on color stability, translucency and elemental surface composition of composite resins: correlation analysis after staining.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Erosive Resistance of High-Translucency Resin Composites: New Insights for Esthetic Dentistry.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Review
- Assessment of Color Stability of Various Flowable Composite Resins with Different Viscosities.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Factors influencing color match of monochromatic resin composites: a narrative review.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To compare the color stability of a monochromatic nano-hybrid resin, a Bulk-Fill nano-hybrid resin, and a micro-hybrid resin after exposure to three staining beverages. Material and Methods: A monochromatic nano-hybrid resin (Vittra APS Unique), a Bulk-Fill nano-hybrid resin (Filtek™ Bulk-Fill) and a micro-hybrid resin (Filtek™ Z250 XT) were used. Two hundred twenty-eight samples (8 mm x 2 mm discs) were manufactured. The samples were divided into four subgroups based on the type of staining beverage (Coffee, black tea, Coca-Cola). Distilled water was used as control. The initial color of the samples was recorded after 24 hours, as well as after 7 and 15 days of immersion. The color difference (ΔE) was calculated with the CIE2000 formula. The two-way ANCOVA test was used for the analysis, and the significance level was adjusted to 5%. Results: A statistically significant interaction between beverage and resin types on ΔE values was observed while controlling for immersion time ( Conclusions: The monochromatic resin showed a greater color change than the micro-hybrid and Bulk-Fill resins when immersed in coffee and black tea. Conversely, the Bulk-Fill resin was more prone to discoloration when exposed to Coca-Cola.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.