ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Immediate dental implant placement: A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to scrutinize the characteristics of the 100 most cited articles concerning the immediate placement of dental implants. Material and Methods: Employing a specific search strategy comprising keywords and Boolean operators, we conducted a comprehensive search in the Web of Science database in January 2024. The identified articles were then arranged in descending order based on their citation counts. Two researchers meticulously gathered information on the number and density of citations, publication year and journal, study design, authorship and affiliations, keywords, as well as the country and continent of origin. Bibliometric maps were constructed using VOSviewer. Results: The citations for the selected articles ranged from 76 to 569, spanning the publication years 1994 to 2018. Clinical Oral Implants Research emerged as the most frequently referenced journal, accounting for 30% of the publications. Interventional studies constituted the majority (29%) of the articles. Buser D and Lang NP were the most prolific authors, each contributing 11% of the published articles. The University of Bern had a total representation of 10%. The United States garnered significant attention at 20%, while Europe emerged as the predominant continent, constituting 46% of the publications. VOSviewer maps illustrated a convergence of authorship. Conclusions: The 100 most cited articles on immediate implant placement predominantly originated from authors in the United States, emphasizing Clinical Oral Implants Research as a notable outlet featuring observational studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.