Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40485936›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Organ donation after medically assisted death on psychiatric grounds: an ethical analysis.

Karlijn van Vlerken, Radboud Marijnissen, Rosalie Pronk, Guy Widdershoven, Sisco van Veen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karlijn van VlerkenDepartment of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Radboud MarijnissenDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Rosalie PronkIQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center (UMC), Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Guy WiddershovenDepartment of Ethics, Law and Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sisco van VeenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ donation after medical assistance in dying (MAID) on psychiatric grounds is a relatively new practice that poses complex ethical challenges. This paper explores several ethical issues that are important for guiding current and future practice. While organ donation after MAID may alleviate organ shortages, it also prompts concerns regarding the instrumentalization of human life. However, it can be argued that if a patient wishes to donate, based on insight and deliberation, the person is not just regarded as a means. This implies that decision-making capacity is crucial, which requires considering the potential influence of psychiatric disorders. A further issue that can compromise decision-making is susceptibility to external pressures. Careful assessment of the patient's decision-making capacity and the absence of external pressure are needed to avoid the stigmatization of individuals with psychiatric conditions. Further research to better understand the possible interplay between psychiatric disorders and decision-making capacity in the context of organ donation after MAID is recommended.

Indexed as

autonomydecision-making capacitymedical assistance in dyingorgan donationstigmatization

Identifiers

PMID40485936
PMCPMC12143262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.