ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025
Outcomes and predictive factors after second stereotactic radiosurgery for refractory trigeminal neuralgia.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Repeat gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- Division Specific Biologically Effective Dose Predicts Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Trigeminal Neuralgia.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Article
- Neurovascular Compression Syndromes of Cranial Nerves: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Management.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Updated Evidence of Acupuncture for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with GRADE Assessment.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesThis study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (GKSRS) retreatment (T2) for recurrent or refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN) following an initial SRS treatment (T1). Methods: We analyzed 53 patients who underwent T2 between 2012 and 2018 using a prospectively maintained single institution database. Baseline characteristics, treatment details, and toxicity data were assessed, with pain responses evaluated via Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scores. Predictors of pain recurrence and chronic sensory toxicity were identified using univariate and multivariable analyses. Results: The median T2 maximum dose was 70 Gy, primarily targeting the cisternal segment (43 %) and retrogasserian zone (RGZ) (34 %). Following T2, 95 % experienced initial pain relief with a 1-month median time to response, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year freedom from pain recurrence of 51 %, 45 %, and 41 %, respectively. Chronic sensory deficits were observed in 62 % of patients, but motor toxicity remained rare (mastication deficit: 2.5 %; facial motor deficit: 5.1 %). RGZ targeting (HR = 3.84, p = 0.02) and single isocenter treatments (HR = 3.85, p = 0.04) were predictive of pain recurrence when compared to dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) targeting and two isocenters, respectively. Affected trigeminal nerve length <11.5 mm was associated with chronic sensory deficits (OR = 7.14, p = 0.02). Conclusion: GKSRS provides effective pain relief and manageable toxicity in retreatment for refractory/recurrent TN. Optimizing parameters, including DREZ targeting and dual-isocenter strategies, can enhance outcomes, while balancing treatment length to mitigate chronic sensory toxicity. Future research should aim at optimizing treatment parameters to maximize pain relief while minimizing toxicity for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.