ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Translated Version of the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation and Validation of the Canadian-French Version of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII 2.0-CF).Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Translation, cross-cultural validity and reliability of a Danish version of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0).Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) Score and the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 in a Polish Pediatric Population.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polish Validation and Language Adaptation of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score are reliable, valid patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for evaluating patellofemoral instability. Both have been translated and culturally adapted to various languages to document PROs accurately. However, no validated Arabic versions of these PRO measures exist. Purpose: To translate the BPII 2.0 and NPI score into Arabic and assess the reliability and validity of the translated questionnaires. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The NPI score and BPII 2.0 were translated into Arabic based on standard guidelines recommended by the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments. Patients who underwent patellofemoral stabilization surgery were included in this study. Respondents completed the translated versions of the questionnaires 1 week apart. The validity of the translation was assessed using Cronbach alpha, and Pearson correlation coefficient ( Results: The translated versions were assessed in 83 patients and found reliable. The response rate was 94.3%. A negative correlation was found between the KS and NPI score ( Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the translated Arabic versions of the BPII and NPI score are valid and reliable for measuring PROs in Arabic-speaking patients with patellofemoral instability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.