Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40485869›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Three-Dimensional Printing in Cardiothoracic Surgery: Workflow and Clinical Applications.

Charles G Jenkinson, Tristan L Wood, Jason Chuen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles G JenkinsonDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, AUS.
Tristan L WoodDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, AUS.
Jason ChuenVascular Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advances have been made in the field of three-dimensional (3D) printing in recent times. The hardware required to create high-fidelity, anatomically accurate 3D models of intrathoracic structures, including the great vessels and bony structures, is accessible and easy to use and utilizes consumables that are cost-effective. The quality of 3D printers, especially in consumer-level machines, has improved in recent times, while the price of the hardware has decreased. We have developed a toolchain to create 3D-printed models for use in patient education and consent, operative planning, and student/resident teaching. We outline our approach using a free and open-source toolchain, highlighting the utility of our models so that others may reproduce our techniques in their own clinical and teaching practice.

Indexed as

3d printing in surgery3d printing techniquepatient consentstudent educationthree-dimensional (3d) printing

Identifiers

PMID40485869
PMCPMC12145207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.