Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40485844›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2025

Older people and stroke: a machine learning approach to personalize the rehabilitation of gait.

Elvira Maranesi, Federico Barbarossa, Leonardo Biscetti, Marco Benadduci, Elisa Casoni, Ilaria Barboni, Fabrizia Lattanzio, Lorenzo Fantechi, Daniela Fornarelli, Enrico Paci and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Elvira MaranesiScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Federico BarbarossaScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Leonardo BiscettiUnit of Neurology, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Marco BenadduciScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Elisa CasoniClinical Unit of Physical Rehabilitation, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Ilaria BarboniClinical Unit of Physical Rehabilitation, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Fabrizia LattanzioScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Lorenzo FantechiUnit of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Daniela FornarelliUnit of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Enrico PaciUnit of Radiology, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Sara MecozziUnit of Neuroradiology, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Manuela SalleiUnit of Neuroradiology, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Mirko GiannoniUnit of Neuroradiology, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Giuseppe PelliccioniUnit of Neurology, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Giovanni Renato RiccardiClinical Unit of Physical Rehabilitation, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Valentina Di DonnaClinical Unit of Physical Rehabilitation, IRCCS INRCA, Fermo, Italy.
Roberta BevilacquaScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Stroke is a significant global public health challenge, ranking as the second leading cause of death after heart disease. One of the most debilitating consequences for stroke survivors is the restriction of mobility and walking, which greatly impacts their quality of life. The scientific literature extensively details the characteristics of post-stroke gait, which differs markedly from physiological walking in terms of speed, symmetry, balance control, and biomechanical parameters. This study aims to analyze the gait parameters of stroke survivors, considering the type of stroke and the affected cerebral regions, with the goal of identifying specific gait biomarkers to facilitate the design of personalized and effective rehabilitation programs. Methods: The research focuses on 45 post-stroke patients who experienced either hemorrhagic or ischemic strokes, categorizing them based on the location of brain damage (cortical-subcortical, corona radiata, and basal ganglia). Gait analysis was conducted using the GaitRite system, measuring 39 spatio-temporal parameters. Results: Statistical tests revealed no significant differences, but Principal Component Analysis identified a dominant structure. Machine learning (ML) algorithms-Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)-were employed for classification, with RF demonstrating superior performance in accuracy, precision, recall (all exceeding 85%), and F1 score compared to SVM and KNN. Results indicated ML models could identify stroke types based on gait variables when traditional tests could not. Notably, RF outperformed others, suggesting its efficacy in handling complex and nonlinear data relationships. Discussion: The clinical implication emphasized a connection between gait parameters and cerebral lesion location, notably linking basal ganglia lesions to prolonged double support time. This underscores the basal ganglia's role in motor control, sensory processing, and postural control, highlighting the importance of sensory input in post-stroke rehabilitation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegait parametersmachine learningmedical imagingneurologyolder adultsrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID40485844
PMCPMC12142055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.