ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Longitudinal gut microbiota dynamics in Antarctic research mission crews.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactions Between the Gut Microbiome and Genetic and Clinical Risk Factors for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from Different Geographical Regions of Argentina.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Characteristics and longitudinal stability of Gut Microbiota in healthy individuals across different age groups.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Decoding microbiome responses to quarantine potato wart disease: first insights into suppression and biocontrol by full-length 16S rRNA gene profiling and functional prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The gut microbiota in high-altitude medicine: intersection of hypoxic adaptation and disease management.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A prolonged stay at Antarctic research stations poses unique challenges due to extreme environmental conditions, restricted diets, and cold temperatures, all of which can influence the gut microbiota, an important factor in host health. However, our understanding of how the Antarctic environment affects the gut microbiota remains limited due to small cohort sizes and short study durations. Methods: We analyzed 467 fecal samples collected longitudinally from 48 participants who stayed at Antarctic stations for up to 16 months. Results: Before departing to the Antarctic bases, male participants exhibited three distinct types of gut microbiota, which were differentially altered during and after the stay, depending on the pre-existing microbiota type. Prevotella-dominant microbiota was more susceptible to environmental changes, including the diet, compared with Bacteroides-dominant microbiota. Although the dominant genera in the gut microbiota were stable across all microbiota types, minor genera with high variability could mediate changes in the microbiota. Sharing diets and having frequent contact resulted in cohabitation effects among genetically unrelated participants in the extremely isolated Antarctic environment. Although taxonomic composition shifted in response to the Antarctic environment, predicted functions of the gut microbiota remained relatively stable. Discussion: This study reveals that long-term residence in Antarctic research stations alters the gut microbiota in ways that depends on the intrinsic microbiota prior to the mission. These findings enhance our understanding of human gut microbiota adaptation under extreme and isolated environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.