Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40485731›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Second-line chemotherapy rechallenge in lung cancer patients: a Moroccan real-world study.

Hassan Abdelilah Tafenzi, Farah Choulli, Ismail Essadi, Rhizlane Belbaraka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hassan Abdelilah TafenziMedical Oncology Department, Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech, Marrakech, Morocco.
Farah ChoulliMedical Oncology Department, Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech, Marrakech, Morocco.
Ismail EssadiBiosciences and Health Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakech, Morocco.
Rhizlane BelbarakaMedical Oncology Department, Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech, Marrakech, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the go-to therapeutic option for relapsed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with unidentified oncogenic drivers when first-line platin doublet chemotherapy fails. Meanwhile, few options exist for the treatment of relapsed patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Through the present study, we evaluate the efficacy and hematologic safety of rechallenging chemotherapy in the second line after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: In this retrospective study, we selected patients admitted to a single institution. Adults aged > 18 years with a pathologically proven diagnosis of either NSCLC or SCLC, a PS of 2 or lower, and whose disease progressed during or after a platin-based doublet chemotherapy-containing line of treatment were eligible. The primary outcomes were second-progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with an overall response (complete or partial response), the disease control rate (DCR), and hematological safety. Results: Between January 2013 and December 2022, 155 patients were enrolled and treated in the second line with different available regimens of whom 145 had NSCLC and 10 had SCLC. As of December 31 Conclusion: At progression during or after first-line chemotherapy plus platinum, re-challenging single-agent chemotherapy in monotherapy or erlotinib did not offer modest activity in the Moroccan population.

Indexed as

chemotherapy rechallengelung cancerMoroccan cohortreal world data (RWD)second-line

Identifiers

PMID40485731
PMCPMC12142062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.