Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40485662›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior, & immunity - health2025

Machine learning-based prediction of anxiety disorders using blood metabolite and social trait data from the UK Biobank.

Annabel Smith, Jack J Miller, Daniel C Anthony, Daniel E Radford-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior, & immunity - health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annabel SmithDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3QT, UK.
Jack J MillerOxford Centre for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daniel C AnthonyDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3QT, UK.
Daniel E Radford-SmithDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3QT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are the most prevalent type of mental health disorders and are characterised by excessive fear and worry. Despite affecting one in four individuals within their lifetime, there remains a gap in our understanding regarding the underlying pathophysiology of anxiety disorders, which limits the development of novel treatment options. Exploring blood-based biomarkers of anxiety disorder offers the potential to predict the risk of clinically significant anxiety in the general population, increase our understanding of anxiety pathophysiology, and to reveal options for preventative treatment. Here, using psychosocial variables in combination with blood and urine biomarkers, reported in the UK Biobank, we sought to predict future anxiety onset. Machine learning accurately predicted (ROC AUC: ∼0.83) ICD-10-coded anxiety diagnoses up to 5 years (mean 3.5 years) after blood sampling, against lifetime anxiety-free controls. Analysis of the blood biochemistry measures indicated that anxious individuals were more anaemic and exhibited higher levels of markers of systemic inflammation than controls. However, blood biomarkers alone were not predictive of resilience or susceptibility to anxiety disorders in a subset of individuals rigorously matched for a wide range of psychosocial covariates (ROC AUC: ∼0.50). Overall, we demonstrate that the integration of biological and psychosocial risk factors is an effective tool to screen for and predict anxiety disorder onset in the general population.

Indexed as

AnxietyMetabolomicsNeuroticismRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID40485662
PMCPMC12140939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.