ArticleGlobal change biology2025
Urban Tree Growth and Drought Responses Show Evidence of Climate Resilience.
Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stand age influences the climate response and growth resilience ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Urban-suburban differences in the response of typical greening tree species to extreme drought in a subtropical city.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Optimizing the structure of urban woody plantings for a warming climate: a frequency-weighted exposure framework for woody species in Chongqing, China.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Xylem anatomy differentiation explains coordinated variation of economic and hydraulic traits in urban tree species.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change has a negative impact on the vitality of forests, and drought and heatwaves are the most influential abiotic stressors that contribute to tree health decline and mortality. Urban trees are not only vulnerable to climate change, but they also face harsh environmental conditions, including the urban heat island effect, limited soil volume and water availability. Therefore, the long-term sustainability of urban forests relies on healthy and thriving trees and the identification of species that are resilient to climate change. Thus, it is fundamental to understand how urban trees respond to environmental conditions, including climate. This study investigates how urban trees respond to both long-term climatic conditions and episodic extreme climate events. We evaluated variation in urban tree growth across differing climates by reconstructing growth histories and developing drought response indices. We selected 10 tree species planted in seven cities distributed along temperature and precipitation gradients across the Australian continent. We determined spatial and temporal patterns of tree-ring growth in relation to extreme climate events. We found significant differences among cities, suggesting that local environmental conditions significantly influence tree growth. While some species showed fast annual growth in cool and wet cities, other species had similar growth across all cities or even faster growth in hot and dry cities. Urban trees generally responded positively to wetter conditions during the warmest month, which might be related to longer growing seasons and water availability. We found a positive effect of extreme hot conditions on growth, suggesting that urban trees might be well adapted to warm urban environments. Species climate-growth relationships can help guide species selection to maximize benefits delivered by urban forests and minimize environmental and socio-economic losses under current and future climates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.