ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology2025
Current Opinions and Practices in Functional Neurological Disorders: A Survey of Indian Neurologists.
Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesFunctional neurological disorders (FNDs) are common in clinical practice and a significant cause of disability. In India, the presentation of FNDs is influenced by socio-cultural factors, yet there is limited research on how FNDs are perceived and managed. This survey aimed to explore the diverse clinical experiences of Indian neurologists on FNDs, including the diagnostic and management challenges they face.
methodsAn online survey was sent to 1,571 neurologists across India, collecting 117 responses (7.45%) over 4 weeks. The questionnaire was designed to capture respondent demographics, FND precipitating factors and associated stigma, utilization of diagnostic tools, access to multidisciplinary teams, challenges in patient management, and engagement in FND research and societies.
resultsOverall, 78.6% of the respondents preferred the term "functional." Home-based videos (99.1%) and multidisciplinary teams (67.5%) were commonly used. Barriers included time constraints (73.5%) and prevalent myths surrounding FNDs (95.7%). Only 23.9% reported using neurophysiological tools in FND. Participation in FND-specific societies (3.4%) and research (12%) was remarkably low.
conclusionsOur survey highlights evolving trends and persistent challenges in FND care in India. While the adoption of "functional" terminology, home-based videos for diagnosis, and multidisciplinary approaches mark progress, barriers include time constraints, and prevalent myths. Underutilization of neurophysiological tools is a significant barrier, and professional engagement in FND research and societies is also limited. Enhancing education, specialized training, and professional engagement is essential for improving FND care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.