Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40485174›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2025

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Empathy Fatigue Scale (EFS-HP) for Healthcare Professionals in Critical Care Settings.

Nesrullah Okan, Fuat Zengin, Yusuf Taha Okan, Yahya Şahin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nesrullah OkanDepartment of Educational Sciences, Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9496-6417
Fuat ZenginRepublic of Türkiye, Malatya Il Saglik Mudurlugu, Family Doctor, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1173-9911
Yusuf Taha OkanDepartment of Vocational School of Social Sciences, Management and Organisation, Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7513-9790
Yahya ŞahinDepartment of Educational Sciences, Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-4605

Funding

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpathy fatigue represents a significant concern among healthcare professionals working in critical care settings, including intensive care units, emergency departments and neonatal units. It is an established fact that constant exposure to emotionally intense situations may lead to a state of emotional exhaustion, a reduction in job satisfaction and a compromise in the quality of patient care. Despite the prevalence of this phenomenon, there remains a paucity of profession-specific tools with which to assess empathy fatigue in these high-stress environments.

aimThe objective of this study was to develop and validate the Empathy Fatigue Scale for Healthcare Professionals (EFS-HP), a psychometric tool designed to assess empathy fatigue among professionals working in critical care settings. STUDY

designThe study utilized a multi-phase methodological design, encompassing 296 healthcare professionals who exclusively practised in critical care settings, including intensive care units, emergency departments and neonatal intensive care units. Despite the fact that the sample comprised 60.8% physicians, 27% nurses and midwives and 12.2% other staff, all participants were actively engaged in critical care practice. The 21-item EFS-HP was developed through a rigorous process involving item generation, expert review and pilot testing. The psychometric evaluation comprised exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.958), test-retest reliability (r = 0.891) and criterion validity using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). The results of the CFA indicated that the model demonstrated acceptable fit, with a comparative fit index of 0.918, a TLI of 0.907 and an root mean square error of approximation of 0.080.

resultsThe EFA revealed a unidimensional structure, explaining 54.5% of the total variance. Criterion validity analysis demonstrated significant positive correlations between empathy fatigue and depression (r = 0.485), anxiety (r = 0.348) and stress (r = 0.396), thereby supporting the validity of the scale.

conclusionThe EFS-HP is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of empathy fatigue among healthcare professionals in critical care environments. Its application is particularly relevant for critical care nurses, who frequently face intense emotional demands and are at increased risk for burnout-related outcomes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The EFS-HP is a valuable tool for identifying and managing empathy fatigue specifically among critical care nurses, who form the emotional backbone of intensive care environments. Given their continuous exposure to life-and-death situations, rapid decision-making and patient/family distress, critical care nurses are especially vulnerable to empathy fatigue. The integration of the EFS-HP into clinical practice facilitates the early identification of emotional strain, thereby enabling the implementation of timely, nurse-focused interventions. These interventions have been shown to promote emotional resilience, reduce staff turnover and enhance the overall quality of patient care. Furthermore, the scale's emphasis on the distinctive stressors encountered by nurses in critical care is congruent with the strategic priorities of high-acuity healthcare institutions.

Indexed as

Compassion FatigueCritical CareEmpathyHealth PersonnelPsychometricsAdultBurnout, ProfessionalFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesburnout preventioncritical care nursesempathy fatiguehealthcare professionalsintensive carepsychometric validationscale development

Identifiers

PMID40485174
PMCPMC12146602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.