ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Deep learning-based prospective slice tracking for continuous catheter visualization during MRI-guided cardiac catheterization.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI-guided endovascular robotics: A roadmap to MRI-native systems.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
- 3-T MRI in vitro characterisation of a SPION-polymer balloon catheter: a proof-of-concept study.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Pulmonary Artery Stenting in a Commercial Wide-Bore 0.55-T Scanner.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based prospective slice tracking for continuous catheter visualization during MRI-guided cardiac catheterization.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis proof-of-concept study introduces a novel, deep learning-based, parameter-free, automatic slice-tracking technique for continuous catheter tracking and visualization during MR-guided cardiac catheterization.
methodsThe proposed sequence includes Calibration and Runtime modes. Initially, Calibration mode identifies the catheter tip's three-dimensional coordinates using a fixed stack of contiguous slices. A U-Net architecture with a ResNet-34 encoder is used to identify the catheter tip location. Once identified, the sequence then switches to Runtime mode, dynamically acquiring three contiguous slices automatically centered on the catheter tip. The catheter location is estimated from each Runtime stack using the same network and fed back to the sequence, enabling prospective slice tracking to keep the catheter in the central slice. If the catheter remains unidentified over several dynamics, the sequence reverts to Calibration mode. This artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach was evaluated prospectively in a three-dimensional-printed heart phantom and 3 patients undergoing MR-guided cardiac catheterization. This technique was also compared retrospectively in 2 patients with a previous non-AI automatic tracking method relying on operator-defined parameters.
resultsIn the phantom study, the tracking framework achieved 100% accuracy/sensitivity/specificity in both modes. Across all patients, the average accuracy/sensitivity/specificity were 100 ± 0/100 ± 0/100 ± 0% (Calibration) and 98.4 ± 0.8/94.1 ± 2.9/100.0 ± 0.0% (Runtime). The parametric, non-AI technique and the proposed parameter-free AI-based framework yielded identical accuracy (100%) in Calibration mode and similar accuracy range in Runtime mode (Patients 1 and 2: 100%-97%, and 100%-98%, respectively).
conclusionAn AI-based prospective slice-tracking framework was developed for real-time, parameter-free, operator-independent, automatic tracking of gadolinium-filled balloon catheters. Its feasibility was successfully demonstrated in patients undergoing MRI-guided cardiac catheterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.