ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Brain and Behavior in Persuasion: The Role of Affective-Cognitive Matching.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How undergraduate art students evaluate ChatGPT-generated art interpretations: perceived quality, bias-related judgment, and rating structure.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Changing University Students' Habit Strength Towards Alcohol Consumption Using Affectively and Cognitively Framed Messages.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effectiveness of persuasive messages often depends on how their affective or cognitive content aligns with recipients' predispositions for processing such information. Individual differences in the need for affect (NFA) and need for cognition (NFC) influence engagement with affective or cognitive appeals, but the interplay between intrinsic brain connectivity and these predispositions in shaping persuasive outcomes remains underexplored. This study advances understanding of the affective-cognitive matching effect by integrating intrinsic (resting-state) and extrinsic (task-based) brain-behavior relationships. Using resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigate how NFA and NFC align with intrinsic brain network properties and influence behavioral and neural responses to affective and cognitive persuasive messages. We employ intrinsic connectivity metrics, such as participation coefficient (cross-network communication) and within-module degree (within-network communication), to capture resting-state network dynamics not examined in previous studies. Our results reveal that key regions within the frontoparietal network, which is central to attention, decision-making, and executive functions, play pivotal roles in processing persuasive messages based on participants' motivational orientations. Specifically, affective-oriented individuals exhibit greater neural engagement with congruent affective messages, while cognitive-oriented individuals show intensified engagement under incongruent conditions-a novel finding extending beyond prior research. These findings expand the affective-cognitive matching effect to include intrinsic neural dimensions, highlighting how resting-state brain connectivity primes responses and modulates task engagement according to motivational predispositions. This integrative approach supports the Elaboration Likelihood Model by elucidating distinct neural pathways in persuasion and offers actionable insights for tailoring persuasive strategies to individual affective and cognitive orientations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.