ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
BiGSM: Bayesian inference of gene regulatory network via sparse modelling.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SurvMarker: an R package for identifying survival-associated molecular features using PCA-based weighted scores.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationInference of gene regulatory network (GRN) is challenging due to the inherent sparsity of the GRN matrix and noisy expression data, often leading to a high possibility of false positive or negative predictions. To address this, it is essential to leverage the sparsity of the GRN matrix and develop a robust method capable of handling varying levels of noise in the data. Moreover, most existing GRN inference methods produce only fixed point estimates, which lack the flexibility and informativeness for comprehensive network analysis. In contrast, a Bayesian approach that yields closed-form posterior distributions allows probabilistic link selection, offering insights into the statistical confidence of each possible link. Consequently, it is important to engineer a Bayesian GRN inference method and rigorously execute a benchmark evaluation compared to state-of-the-art methods.
resultsWe propose a method-Bayesian inference of GRN via Sparse Modelling (BiGSM). BiGSM effectively exploits the sparsity of the GRN matrix and infers the posterior distributions of GRN links from noisy expression data by using the maximum likelihood based learning. We thoroughly benchmarked BiGSM using biological and simulated datasets including GeneNetWeaver, GeneSPIDER, and GRNbenchmark. The benchmark test evaluates its accuracy and robustness across varying noise levels and data models. Using point-estimate based performance measures, BiGSM provides an overall best performance in comparison with several state-of-the-art methods including GENIE3, LASSO, LSCON, and Zscore. Additionally, BiGSM is the only method in the set of competing methods that provides posteriors for the GRN weights, helping to decipher confidence across predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code implemented via MATLAB and Python are available at Github: https://github.com/SachLab/BiGSM and archived at zenodo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.