Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40484974›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025

Uncovering functional deterioration in the rhizosphere microbiome associated with post-green revolution wheat cultivars.

Monique E Smith, Vanessa N Kavamura, David Hughes, Rodrigo Mendes, George Lund, Ian Clark, Tim H Mauchline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploring the Bacterial Microbiota of Seeds.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monique E SmithSustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK. monique.smith@slu.se.
Vanessa N KavamuraSustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.
David HughesIntelligent Data Ecosystems, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.
Rodrigo MendesLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Embrapa Environment, Jaguariúna, SP, Brazil.
George LundSustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.
Ian ClarkSustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.
Tim H MauchlineSustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.

Funding

Bilateral BBSRC-Embrapa gran BB/N016246/1Bilateral BBSRC-Embrapa grant BBS/E/C/00005196Growing Health Institute Strategic Programme BB/X010953/1Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas FR2021-02017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the Green Revolution, one of the biggest developments of wheat domestication was the development of new cultivars that respond well to fertilisers and produce higher yields on shorter stems to prevent lodging. Consequently, this change has also impacted the wheat microbiome, often resulting in reduced selection of taxa and a loss of network complexity in the rhizospheres of modern cultivars. Given the importance of rhizosphere microbiomes for plant health and performance, it is imperative that we understand if and how these changes have affected their function. Here, we use shotgun metagenomics to classify the functional potential of prokaryote communities from the rhizospheres of pre-green revolution (heritage) cultivars to compare the impact of modern wheat breeding on rhizosphere microbiome functions.

resultsWe found distinct taxonomic and functional differences between heritage and modern wheat rhizosphere communities and identified that modern wheat microbiomes were less distinct from the communities in the surrounding soil. Of the 113 functional genes that were differentially abundant between heritage and modern cultivars, 95% were depleted in modern cultivars and 65% of differentially abundant reads best mapped to genes involved in staurosporine biosynthesis (antibiotic product), plant cell wall degradation (microbial mediation of plant root architecture, overwintering energy source for microbes) and sphingolipid metabolism (signal bioactive molecules).

conclusionsOverall, our findings indicate that green revolution breeding has developed wheat cultivars with a reduced rhizosphere effect. The consequences of this are likely detrimental to the development of microbiome-assisted agriculture which will require a strong rhizosphere selective environment for the establishment of a beneficial plant root microbiome. We believe our results are of striking importance and highlight that implementation of microbiome facilitated agriculture will benefit from deliberately incorporating the development of beneficial plant-microbiome interactions, alongside traditional yield traits, to advance sustainable wheat production.

Indexed as

Green revolution breedingHeritage cultivarsMicrobial functionsPlant-microbe interactionsWheat dwarfingWheat microbiomes

Identifiers

PMID40484974
PMCPMC12145609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.