ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025
Metabolic response prediction using
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is There an Added Value of Dual-Time-Point [Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the prediction value of metabolic response using gallium 68 (
methodThis single-center prospective study was conducted in our hospital and enrolled participants who was initially diagnosed with NHL and received CHOP-like chemotherapy.
resultsFrom October 2022 to May 2023, 18 participants (10 men and 8 women; median age: 56 years [interquartile range: 47-67 years]) with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were recruited in our hospital and enrolled in this study. The mean values of SUVmax, TBRblood, and TBRmuscle were significantly higher in responders than those in non-responders (8.41[Formula: see text]3.90 vs. 3.98[Formula: see text]2.81 P=0.025; 7.93[Formula: see text]3.31 vs. 3.69[Formula: see text]2.36 P=0.035; 7.04[Formula: see text]3.22 vs. 3.09[Formula: see text]1.73 P = 0.025; respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) of SUVmax, TBRblood, and TBRmuscle were statistically significant (0.875, P = 0.025; 0.857, P=0.034; 0.875, P = 0.026, respectively). SUVmax (OR=0.592, P = 0.041) is a significant factor in the prognosis of these participants.
conclusionLow radiotracer uptake on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.