ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2025
Patient perceptions regarding ambulatory knee arthroplasties in China.
Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile same-day discharge models for knee arthroplasty have gained significant traction in China's evolving healthcare landscape, patient perspectives on ambulatory surgical pathways remain underexplored. This qualitative study addresses a critical gap in the literature by systematically assessing patient experiences and perceptions regarding knee arthroplasty within China's emerging ambulatory care framework.
methodsA prospective cohort of 195 consecutive patients scheduled for primary knee arthroplasty at a tertiary orthopedic referral center underwent structured data collection through the WenJuanXing platform between January 1 and June 1, 2024. This cross-sectional survey employed an anonymous voluntary survey instrument administered at two critical timepoints: 1) prior to any clinical discussions regarding postoperative care pathways, and 2) before initiation of standardized preoperative education protocols.
resultsIn total, 188 participants (96%, 188/195) completed the survey. Of them, 70% were female and 84% were 60 years or older. While 68% were familiar with ambulatory surgery, awareness did not significantly differ by age (P = 0.64), sex (P = 0.19), occupation (P = 0.42), location (P = 0.55), or education level (P = 0.81). Interestingly, only 8 patients anticipated discharge within 24 h post-surgery, with most (71.8%) expecting a 3-day or more stay. However, if postoperative care was assured, 66% expressed comfort with same-day or 24-h discharge. 93% considered ambulatory knee arthroplasty suitable, and 71.8% believed it would yield superior outcomes through quicker recovery and reduced complications, infections, and pain. Despite this optimism, only 45% were willing to endure longer waits, and a third were open to paying more or traveling farther for ambulatory knee arthroplasty.
conclusionThe study reveals that most Chinese patients initially want ≥ 3-day stays but may accept 24-h discharge for knee arthroplasty. One-third are unaware of ambulatory knee arthroplasty, so more education is needed as procedures rise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.