Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40484955›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2025

Microbiota boost immunotherapy? A meta-analysis dives into fecal microbiota transplantation and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Anqi Lin, Lihaoyun Huang, Aimin Jiang, Lingxuan Zhu, Weiming Mou, Yu Li, Chunyan Zhang, Zaoqu Liu, Jian Zhang, Quan Cheng and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. COPD-Lung Cancer Comorbidity: Mechanistic Insights and Precision Oncology Implications.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anqi Lin *Donghai County People's Hospital (Affiliated Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University); Department of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Lianyungang, China.
Lihaoyun Huang *Department of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Aimin Jiang *Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Lingxuan ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weiming MouDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu LiDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chunyan ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zaoqu LiuInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Quan ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. chengquan@csu.edu.cn.
Ting WeiDepartment of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. weitingyouyou@qq.com.
Peng LuoDonghai County People's Hospital (Affiliated Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University); Department of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Lianyungang, China. luopeng@smu.edu.cn.

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2022A1515111212Hunan Youth Science and Technology Talent Project NO.2023RC3074National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172750National Natural Science Foundation of China 82373129Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515012593Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 2023A04J1257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a cornerstone of modern cancer treatment, but their effectiveness is limited. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which alters the gut microbiome, has shown promise in enhancing ICIs' therapeutic effects.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of relevant studies available up to September 30, 2024, to analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of combining FMT with ICIs in cancer treatment. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), with secondary evaluations of survival outcomes and safety.

resultsA total of 10 studies involving 164 patients with solid tumors were included. The pooled ORR was 43% (95% CI: 0.35-0.51). Subgroup analysis revealed that the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapies was associated with a significantly higher ORR (60%) compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy (37%; P = 0.01). The incidence of grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs) was 42% (95% CI: 0.32-0.52), while grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 37% of patients (95% CI: 0.28-0.46).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence supporting the use of FMT as a strategy to enhance the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors. However, larger-scale randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are required to confirm and optimize treatment protocols.

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyNeoplasmsHumansTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAdverse eventsClinical efficacyFecal microbiota transplantationImmune checkpoint inhibitorsObjective response rate

Identifiers

PMID40484955
PMCPMC12147380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.