Trial reportBMC medicine2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis and prognostication in low ejection fraction using electrocardiograms in inpatient department: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05117970 (Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis and Prognostication in Low Ejection Fraction Using Electrocardiograms), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Artificial Intelligence-assisted Diagnosis and Prognostication in Low Ejection Fraction Using Electrocardiograms
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel imagery-based retrieval-extinction training for intervention in nicotine addiction.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Artificial intelligence to support clinical practice across the inpatient heart failure care pathway: a systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Internal Medicine: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap from clinical to home ECG: quantifying and overcoming accuracy loss in AI-enabled single-lead ECG models.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The Evolving Utility of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools for the Detection of Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: From Potential to Implementation.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Emerging Artificial Intelligence Tools for the Screening of Structural and Valvular Heart Disease.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Impact of artificial intelligence on cardiovascular workflow, engagement, and outcomes: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in cardiology in the current era: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Development and temporal validation of a two-stage ECG-based machine learning model for LVEF screening: a Middle Eastern cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Hierarchical fusion of electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram data improves heart failure detection.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography for assessment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the era of foundation models.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography from scientific research to clinical application.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly diagnosis of low ejection fraction (EF) remains challenging despite being a treatable condition. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an electrocardiogram (ECG)-based artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted clinical decision support tool in improving the early diagnosis of low EF among inpatient patients under non-cardiologist care.
methodsWe conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial at an academic medical center in Taiwan. 13,631 inpatient patients were randomized to either the intervention group (n = 6,840) receiving AI-generated ECG results or the control group (n = 6,791) following standard care. The primary outcome was the incidence of newly diagnosed low EF (≤ 50%) within 30 days following the ECG. Secondary outcomes included echocardiogram utilization rates, positive predictive value for low EF detection, and cardiology consultation rates. Statistical analysis included hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event outcomes and chi-square tests for categorical variables.
resultsThe intervention significantly increased the detection of newly diagnosed low EF in the overall cohort (1.5% vs. 1.1%, HR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.11-2.03, P = 0.023), with a more pronounced effect among AI-identified high-risk patients (13.0% vs. 8.9%, HR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.08-2.21). While overall echocardiogram utilization remained similar between groups (17.1% vs. 17.3%, HR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.92-1.09), the intervention group demonstrated higher positive predictive value for identifying low EF among patients receiving echocardiogram (34.2% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis revealed increased cardiology consultation rates among high-risk patients in the intervention group (29.3% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.027).
conclusionsImplementation of an AI-ECG algorithm enhanced the early diagnosis of low EF in the inpatient setting, primarily by improving diagnostic efficiency rather than increasing overall healthcare utilization. The tool was particularly effective in identifying high-risk patients who benefited from increased specialist consultation and more targeted diagnostic testing.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05117970.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.