Trial reportInternational wound journal2025
A Randomised Cross-Over Study to Evaluate the Physiological Effects of Internal Air Pressure Changes in Advanced Support Surface Design.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High specification mattresses periodically redistribute pressure using alternating air cells, offloading tissues. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of alternating air pressure gradients on sacral tissue physiology. This randomised cross-over study recruited 15 healthy participants to test the three mattress settings (fast cycle, normal cycle, and slow cycle). Participants were asked to adopt supine, lateral, and high sitting (head of bed at 40°) postures, whilst transcutaneous tissue gas tensions and interface pressures at the sacrum were continuously monitored. Comparison between mattress settings and postures showed no statistical difference (p > 0.05) between peak pressure index values at the sacrum for each air inflation cycle speed setting. By contrast, a significantly higher sacral (p < 0.05) contact area was observed for high sitting. During high sitting, ischemic responses during both fast and normal air inflation cycle speed settings were recorded. During the slow air inflation cycle speed, most participants (60%-100%) showed high levels of perfusion. The present study identified a main effect of posture on interface pressure and perfusion over the sacrum. The alternating mattress speed influenced local tissue perfusion, with the greatest changes in tissue oxygenation occurring in a high-speed setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.