Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40484899›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2025

Characterising the Behaviour of a Structured PDE Model of the Cell Cycle in Contrast to a Corresponding ODE System.

Ruby E Nixson, Helen M Byrne, Joe M Pitt-Francis, Philip K Maini

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruby E NixsonWolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. ruby.nixson@maths.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3178-3789
Helen M Byrne *Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Joe M Pitt-Francis *Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Philip K Maini *Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/W524311/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental results have shown that anti-cancer therapies, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, can modulate the cell cycle and generate cell cycle phase-dependent responses. As a result, obtaining a detailed understanding of the cell cycle is one possible path towards improving the efficacy of many of these therapies. Here, we consider a basic structured partial differential equation (PDE) model for cell progression through the cell cycle, and derive expressions for key quantities, such as the population growth rate and cell phase proportions. These quantities are shown to be periodic and, as such, we compare the PDE model to a corresponding ordinary differential equation (ODE) model in which the parameters are linked by ensuring that the long-term ODE behaviour agrees with the average PDE behaviour. By design, we find that the ODE model does an excellent job of representing the mean dynamics of the PDE model within just a few cell cycles. However, by probing the parameter space we find cases in which this mean behaviour is not a good measure of the PDE population growth. Our analytical comparison of two caricature models (one PDE and one ODE system) provides insight into cases in which the simple ODE model is an appropriate approximation to the PDE model.

Indexed as

Cell CycleModels, BiologicalCell ProliferationComputer SimulationHumansMathematical ConceptsNeoplasmsAge-structured modelsCell cycleMathematical modellingStructured PDE

Identifiers

PMID40484899
PMCPMC12146229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.