ArticleJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2025
International survey of treatment practices for atopic dermatitis in pregnant and breastfeeding women: Physician perspectives.
Article in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- International survey of treatment practices for atopic dermatitis in pregnant and breastfeeding women: Physician perspectives.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesSystemic treatment of pregnant/breastfeeding atopic dermatitis (AD) patients is challenging due to limited safety data. We explored treatment practices with systemic agents, including the guideline-recommended cyclosporine as the first systemic choice as well as emerging therapies, in this vulnerable population. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe Global Allergy and Asthma Excellence Network (GA
results103 physicians from 32 countries completed the survey, primarily dermatologists (n = 48) or allergologists (n = 43). Antihistamines were the systemic drug most often considered to be used during pregnancy/breastfeeding (n = 73/81, 90.1%), with fewer physicians considering the use of systemic agents for the first trimester compared to later stages of pregnancy. For acute flares, systemic corticosteroids (n = 34/80, 42.5%) were preferred, followed by biologics and antihistamines (each n = 15/80, 18.8%). Although the guideline-recommended cyclosporine is sometimes considered for AD during pregnancy (n = 38/81, 46.9%), it was rarely considered as the preferred drug by physicians (n = 1/80, 1.25%).
conclusionsOur study shows a misalignment between guideline recommendations and prescription patterns and highlights an unmet need for knowing and using the existing recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.