SynthesisInternational wound journal2025
What Is the Impact of Care Bundles on the Prevalence or Incidence of Pressure Ulcers Among At-Risk Adults in the Acute Care Setting? A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Nurses' Knowledge Regarding Pressure Injury: A National Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A pressure ulcer is an injury to the skin and underlying tissues caused by pressure, shear or a combination of the two. In Europe, the mean prevalence rate of pressure ulcers is 10.8%, in Ireland, it is less than 12%. Using systematic review methodology, original research studies written in English were included, employing pre- and post-studies, quality improvement initiatives or projects, randomised controlled trials and experimental studies. Data was extracted using a pre-designed data extraction tool and quality appraisal was undertaken using the Evidence-Based Librarianship (EBL) tool. Where appropriate, a meta-analysis was undertaken using RevMan. The study protocol was pre-registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023442711). Following the search, 628 records were returned, of which 25 met the inclusion criteria. The studies were conducted in a variety of acute healthcare settings. Of the included studies, 16 presented data on incidence and 12 presented data on prevalence of pressure ulcers post-implementation of a care bundle. A meta-analysis of 10 studies discussing incidence indicates the RR of PU is 0.40 (95% CI: 0.21-0.78; p = 0.007), supporting the use of a care bundle. A meta-analysis of seven studies discussing prevalence indicates the RR of PU is 0.34 (95% CI: 0.21-0.56; p = 0.0001), demonstrating the reduction in the RR of PU development in favour of the care bundle group. A variety of care bundle elements were found in the studies. Although results indicated the use of a care bundle was advantageous in preventing a pressure ulcer in the acute care setting, it was unclear which of these elements were most effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.