Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40484806›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025

Engineering Anisotropic Mechanical Properties in Large-Scale Fabricated Cartilage Constructs Using Microfiber Reinforcement.

Lennard Spauwen, Alba Pueyo Moliner, Patrick van Veenendaal, Roel Custers, Jos Malda, Mylène de Ruijter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lennard SpauwenDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0405-7196
Alba Pueyo MolinerDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1019-331X
Patrick van VeenendaalUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Padualaan 99, Utrecht, 3584 CH, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0096-643X
Roel CustersDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-2883
Jos MaldaDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-7676
Mylène de RuijterDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-8379

Funding

Dutch Research Council (NWO) 024.003.013Dutch Research Council (NWO) NWA.1389.20.192Dutch Research Council (NWO) SUMMIT.1.027HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 101142063HORIZON EUROPE Health 101191729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing prevalence of cartilage damage in the knee joint, effective regenerative treatments remain limited. One of the current challenges is the accurate matching of the local mechanical properties of the tissue, which vary throughout the articular joint surface. This study investigates the fabrication of cartilage constructs with anisotropic mechanical properties. Specifically, it aims to develop composite constructs by reinforcing gelatin-methacryloyl (gelMA) hydrogels with melt electrowritten (MEW) fibers arranged to mimic the surface anisotropic mechanical properties of the native articular cartilage. Large-size anisotropic MEW scaffolds are successfully generated, after which they are embedded in the hydrogel, yielding stable constructs. Local mechanical properties can be tailored by varying the fiber spacing while providing a suitable environment for Articular Cartilage Chondroprogenitor cells (ACPCs) to deposit a cartilage-like matrix. Importantly, unlike reinforcement with fibers generated with fused deposition modeling (FDM), reinforcement with MEW avoided stress shielding, thereby facilitating cell response. This highlights the potential of these reinforced constructs to further match local tissue characteristics and provide a durable solution for the restoration of larger cartilage defects.

Indexed as

AnisotropyCartilage, ArticularGelatinTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsElectrochemistryHorsesHydrogelsMethacrylatesTissue EngineeringGelatingelatin methacryloylHydrogelsMethacrylatesanisotropic scaffoldscartilagemelt electrowritingregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID40484806
PMCPMC12304834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.