ArticleThe clinical teacher2025
The Impact of Gender, Training Year, Medical Specialty and the COVID-19 Pandemic on Resident Wellness.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionData are limited as to which factors most strongly impact medical trainees' well-being, and few studies have assessed trainee's wellness at multiple time points during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, much research has not taken an intersectional approach to understanding the ways in which different facets of a resident's identity impact their wellness. Thus, more person-centred, probability-driven statistical approaches that can produce distinct heterogenous groups of individuals are warranted to understand the way in which different identities are associated with resident wellness scores.
methodsA latent profile analysis was conducted using institutional data from resident surveys administered from 2019 to 2022. We had a 78.8% response rates for a total of 1101 surveys completed and 1033 retained for data analysis (i.e., 662 medical residents, 204 surgical residents, 48 pharmacy residents and 119 residents who did not specify practice type).
resultsBroadly, findings indicated that having certain identities (i.e., being female, being in a medical or pharmacy programme and length of time in programme) resulted in lower resident wellness scores. However, the degree to which these scores were impacted appeared to be dependent on the intersection of the residents' identities with COVID-19 time point being moderately influential (e.g., advanced medical/pharmacy residents scored lower in latter part of COVID-19; PGY1 medical residents scored lower regardless of COVID-19 time point).
conclusionsResults from this study encourage data-driven approaches to wellness initiatives that are tailored by gender, programme type and year of programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.