ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2025
Building consensus on prescribing self-directed occupational therapy activities: A Delphi study.
Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing clinical decision-making in inpatient rehabilitation: A scoping review.Clinical rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Building consensus on prescribing self-directed occupational therapy activities: A Delphi study.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOccupational therapy practice focuses on occupation-based interventions, considering the interaction between the person, environment, and task. In Australia, combining supervised therapy with self-directed practice is feasible, even for health-care consumers with cognitive impairments. This study aims to explore the self-practice programs developed by occupational therapists and delivered in inpatient rehabilitation and develop core recommendations for such interventions.
methodsEthical approval for this Delphi consensus study was granted by Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee. The study involved an online survey and two focus groups with Australian occupational therapists. Participants were recruited via snowball sampling and required to meet specific experience criteria. Content analysis was used to analyse data, and consensus was reached on core recommendations for prescribing self-practice in inpatient rehabilitation. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Occupational therapists who prescribe self-practice to health-care consumers were the community of interest and directly involved in the Delphi consensus process to inform study findings. Consumers using self-practice activities were not included in the study.
resultsIn Round 1 of the Delphi process, 21 occupational therapists participated in an anonymous online survey about prescribing self-practice in inpatient rehabilitation. The survey identified key recommendations across various categories. Round 2 focus groups further refined these recommendations, and Round 3 achieved consensus, incorporating additional feedback and suggestions for implementing self-practice programs. It found variability in implementation, with neurological and general rehabilitation health-care consumers most likely to receive self-practice tasks.
conclusionThis Australian study explored how occupational therapists prescribe self-practice during inpatient rehabilitation. The study emphasised the importance of clinical reasoning and environmental factors, offering recommendations to guide goal-focused, client-centred self-practice interventions for better health-care consumer outcomes. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We looked at occupational therapists in Australia. We wanted to know how therapists gave self-practice activities to people. Our focus was on people in recovery hospitals. People do self-practice activities without a therapist. People do these activities outside therapy sessions. This study used a survey and focus groups. Skilled therapists agreed on ideas for self-practice. The results showed differences in self-practice methods. Self-practice is common in stroke and general recovery. The study gave self-practice tips for therapists. It included what, how, and why they prescribe these activities. Therapists should think about each person's goals. They should understand what helps self-practice. We know what therapists are doing. We support therapists to include self-practice programs in regular care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.