ArticleInternational journal of stem cells2025
Assessment of Stem Cell Viability through Visual Analysis Coupled with Teachable Machine.
Article in International journal of stem cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning of conversation-based 'filmstrips' for robust Alzheimer's disease detection.npj aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell viability is an indispensable aspect of cells in the field of drug discovery, cell biology, and biomedical research to assess the physiological conditions of cells such as healthiness, functionality, survivability, etc. Recently, there have been several methods for determining the cell viability through either cell staining with trypan blue and acridine orange, propidium iodide, calcein-AM, etc., or colorimetric assays such as cell counting kit-8 assay. However, these methods have some limitations like time-consuming, expensive, unstable, individual variability, etc. Even present artificial intelligence software such as QuPath, ImageJ, etc., can only determine the cell viability after cell staining. Therefore, we attempted to determine whether cells are alive or not depending on the visual characteristics of an individual cell using Teachable Machine, a web-based artificial intelligence tool provided by Google. Labeling work to assign correct answers to learning data consumes a lot of time and human costs because it is usually done manually. To solve this problem, labeling was automated by recognizing and extracting only individual cells from the image using the contour function to increase time efficiency. In addition, many datasets were created to evaluate and compare the performances of models. Based on the results, the model that showed the best performance showed an accuracy of more than 80%. In conclusion, this model could minimize analysis time, expenses, individual variability, etc., enhancing the efficacy and reproducibility of biological experiments in the fields of drug discovery, drug development, and biological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.