Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40484699›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of stem cells2025

Assessment of Stem Cell Viability through Visual Analysis Coupled with Teachable Machine.

Chanhyung Kim, Jisu Son, Dinesh Chaudhary, Yeon-Kyun Park, Ji Hyeon Cho, Dongryeol Ryu, Jee-Heon Jeong, Jonghee Youn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of stem cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chanhyung KimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2404-5912
Jisu SonDepartment of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8266-3209
Dinesh ChaudharyDepartment of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3313-4967
Yeon-Kyun ParkDepartment of Computer Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1371-890X
Ji Hyeon ChoDepartment of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3757-7304
Dongryeol RyuDepartment of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5905-6760
Jee-Heon JeongDepartment of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7120-169X
Jonghee YounDepartment of Computer Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7408-3804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell viability is an indispensable aspect of cells in the field of drug discovery, cell biology, and biomedical research to assess the physiological conditions of cells such as healthiness, functionality, survivability, etc. Recently, there have been several methods for determining the cell viability through either cell staining with trypan blue and acridine orange, propidium iodide, calcein-AM, etc., or colorimetric assays such as cell counting kit-8 assay. However, these methods have some limitations like time-consuming, expensive, unstable, individual variability, etc. Even present artificial intelligence software such as QuPath, ImageJ, etc., can only determine the cell viability after cell staining. Therefore, we attempted to determine whether cells are alive or not depending on the visual characteristics of an individual cell using Teachable Machine, a web-based artificial intelligence tool provided by Google. Labeling work to assign correct answers to learning data consumes a lot of time and human costs because it is usually done manually. To solve this problem, labeling was automated by recognizing and extracting only individual cells from the image using the contour function to increase time efficiency. In addition, many datasets were created to evaluate and compare the performances of models. Based on the results, the model that showed the best performance showed an accuracy of more than 80%. In conclusion, this model could minimize analysis time, expenses, individual variability, etc., enhancing the efficacy and reproducibility of biological experiments in the fields of drug discovery, drug development, and biological research.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCell shapeCell viabilityImage processing

Identifiers

PMID40484699
PMCPMC12394080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.