ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2025
Validation of a parent-reported outcome measure for young boys with a condition affecting sex development (PRO-CSD).
Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo validate a short parent-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire in young boys with conditions affecting sex development (PRO-CSD).
designConsecutive sample cross-sectional study.
settingA single tertiary children's hospital in Glasgow, UK. PATIENTS: A total number of 98 parents of 98 affected boys with a median age of 3.1 years (10th, 90th: 0.7, 5.4).
interventionsCompletion of recently developed brief PRO-CSD consisting of a parent proxy-report (PPR) and a parent self-report (PSR). MAIN OUTCOMES: The study assessed test-retest reliability in 41 cases as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and group construct validity in 98 by exploring associations with seven demographic and clinical features.
resultsThe median ICC for all items was 0.8 (0.6, 0.9). On the PSR, parents of boys with an external masculinisation score (EMS) of less than 7 out of 12 were more concerned about their child's genitalia compared with those with an EMS of greater than 10.5 (p=0.01). An association with EMS was also observed for questions on future social concerns (p<0.01), future relationships (p<0.01) and stress on receiving the diagnosis (p=0.03). This association with EMS was maintained following adjustment for surgical history, parental age and education level. EMS was the only significant independent determinant of the overall PSR score. In the PPR analysis, parents in the lower socioeconomic grouping and those without tertiary education reported more concerns on the physical functioning of their children.
conclusionsThe psychometric properties of the PRO-CSD tool demonstrate its utility for the screening of parent-reported, condition-specific health-related quality of life outcomes in young boys with a CSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.