Observational studyBMJ open2025
Perceptions of hospital feeding practices among mothers of infants with severe pneumonia in Malawi: a qualitative descriptive study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reach, implementation fidelity, and safety of bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) therapy in children with severe pneumonia in Pakistan.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine caregiver knowledge of, attitudes towards, and perceptions of feeding practices for infants admitted to a tertiary referral hospital with severe pneumonia, and to identify community feelings about nasogastric tube feeding in Malawi.
settingThe paediatric ward of a government tertiary referral hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi.
methodsFrom March through April 2023, we conducted in-depth interviews with 14 mothers of infants 0-12 months of age hospitalised with severe pneumonia who had been enrolled in an observational study evaluating feeding and swallowing in breastfed infants. In-depth interviews assessed mothers' attitudes towards hospital feeding practices including nasogastric tube feeding, along with community perceptions of nasogastric tubes. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach to assess themes and subthemes of transcripts.
resultsMothers understood that children with pneumonia are at risk of 'choking' during oral feeding; however, they had substantial worries about both withholding breastfeeding and providing nasogastric feeds to their infants through a nasogastric tube. Community perceptions of nasogastric tubes were widely negative and included beliefs that nasogastric tubes cause children to 'choke' and die and that medical providers want to harm children. Mothers held strong beliefs about the benefits of breastfeeding.
conclusionThere are alarming misconceptions in the community around nasogastric tubes and the intentions of medical providers. This leads to maternal concerns about this hospital feeding practice, poor adherence to medical recommendations, and mistrust in the broader healthcare system. To improve hospital outcomes of children with severe pneumonia, caregiver and community education is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.