ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2025
Integrative analysis of psychosocial, chronotype, and environmental predictors of aggressive behavior in Adolescents: Insights from machine learning.
Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the behavioral-affective network of physical activity and aggressive behavior among adolescents: a network and Bayesian graph analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aggressive behavior in adolescents and young adults is a significant public health concern associated with adverse educational, social, and mental health outcomes. This study aimed to identify key predictors of aggression using a cross-sectional dataset from a large, longitudinal U.S. cohort. The outcome was self-reported aggressive behavior, and predictors spanned demographic, psychosocial, behavioral, and contextual domains, including adverse life events, impulsivity, family conflict, peer and school environments, and chronotype.Multiple models were evaluated, including linear regression, a hypertuned random forest, a tuned gradient boosting machine (GBM), XGBoost, and an ensemble model combining random forest and GBM predictions. All models were trained using five-fold cross-validation across five multiply imputed datasets. Linear regression achieved the highest predictive accuracy (r = 0.313; MSE = 40.76), followed closely by the random forest (r = 0.311; MSE = 40.71). The ensemble and GBM models showed slightly lower performance. Across models, key predictors included adverse life events, delayed chronotype, peer network health, family cohesion, and normalized household income.These findings underscore the contribution of environmental and psychological stressors to adolescent aggression, particularly the buffering role of cohesive peer and family relationships. Despite similar predictive accuracy across models, machine learning methods offered advantages for variable importance ranking and interaction discovery. Results highlight the utility of integrating diverse psychosocial, behavioral, and contextual measures to better understand complex behavioral outcomes and inform targeted prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.