ArticleJournal of biomechanics2025
Kinematics and kinetics of the shoe during unexpected ladder slip events.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foot slipping is a common initiating event in ladder falls, often leading to severe injuries. Methods for measuring the slipperiness of rungs are impeded by a lack of data on slip events during climbing. This study investigated the kinematics and kinetics of ladder slip events to guide coefficient of friction test methods for ladder rungs. Eighty-eight participants (45F, 43 M; 43.4 ± 12.3 yrs; 80.1 ± 16.9 kg; 170.9 ± 91.6 cm) climbed a series of ladder configurations with differing rung designs and ladder angles in a randomized order. A liquid contaminant (90 % glycerol +10 % water by volume) was applied during each participant's final trial and the responses were categorized into slip and non-slip events with a cluster analysis and reviewer classification. A total of 11 slipping events (9 forward and 2 backward slips) were identified from 102 ladder climbs based upon their peak slipping speeds and slip distances. Slipping speed, shoe-rung angle, transverse foot angle, normal force, shear force, anterior-posterior (AP) foot position, and medio-lateral (ML) foot position were quantified at the start of slip and at the peak slipping speed for forward slips with mean values and 95 % confidence intervals reported. Slips had speeds of 0.34 m/s at their peak, with normal forces around 460 N. We argue the need for testing conditions informed by the under-shoe conditions observed in this study: forward slipping (8° dorsiflexion, 0.34 m/s, 400 N).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.