ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2026
Hyperlaxity in Hand Surgery: A Cross-sectional Survey.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJoint hypermobility syndrome comprises a spectrum of disorders associated with increased rates of injury and degeneration in all joints. However, there is a paucity of literature on these patients' features within the hand clinic. In this study, we characterize hyperlaxity patients in the hand clinic setting to help inform evaluation and management.
methodsAll patients who presented to a single surgeon's clinic over a 10-year period with a diagnosis of joint hypermobility were collected. Retrospective review of demographic data, orthopedic history, presenting symptoms, and diagnoses were collected. The Beighton score was recorded.
resultsA total of 210 patients were included-6% of all new patients, or twice the expected rate. The hand clinic provided the first orthopedic evaluation for 46% of patients. Their average age was 37.1 years, with most lacking inciting trauma. The Beighton scores were above 6/9. Most patients had previous diagnoses of wrist pathology but not of hyperlaxity and had multiple, bilateral, and recurrent wrist disorders. Pain was present in 90% of patients. Conditions such as nerve compression and trigger fingers were uncommon.
conclusionJoint hyperlaxity is prevalent in the hand clinic and is likely underdiagnosed. Hyperlaxity patients are, on average, younger than other hand surgery patients, with multiple complaints and a history of orthopedic injuries. These patients most commonly complain of wrist pathology. Of note, the hand clinic provided the first musculoskeletal specialist evaluation for half the hyperlaxity patients in our cohort, underscoring the importance of early screening, diagnosis, and multidisciplinary therapy in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.