Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40483661›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Clinical Utility of the Sport Concussion Office Assessment Tool 6 (SCOAT6) and Other Select Multidomain Assessments for Subacute Sport-Related Concussion.

Anthony P Kontos, Aaron J Zynda, Alicia M Trbovich, Jonathan French, Nathan Kegel, Christopher Burley, Shan Patel, Anne Mucha, Melissa N Womble, Sabrina Jennings and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of co-morbid anxiety and depression history on multidomain concussion clinical outcomes and recovery time.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anthony P KontosDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Sports Medicine Concussion Program, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Aaron J ZyndaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Sports Medicine Concussion Program, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. ajz61@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0663-7320
Alicia M TrbovichDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Sports Medicine Concussion Program, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Jonathan FrenchDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Sports Medicine Concussion Program, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Nathan KegelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Sports Medicine Concussion Program, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Christopher BurleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Sports Medicine Concussion Program, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Shan PatelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Sports Medicine Concussion Program, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.
Anne MuchaUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Rehabilitation Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Melissa N WombleInova Sports Medicine Concussion Program, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Sabrina JenningsInova Sports Medicine Concussion Program, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Christina M DollarInova Sports Medicine Concussion Program, Fairfax, VA, USA.
R J ElbinUniversity of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Michael W CollinsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Sports Medicine Concussion Program, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 S Water St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a need for an empirically supported, clinically pragmatic set of multidomain tools for the subacute assessment of sport-related concussion in clinical settings. The Concussion in Sport Group recommended a new tool called the Sport Concussion Office Assessment Tool 6 (SCOAT6) for a subacute (3-30 days) sport-related concussion assessment; however, it has yet to be empirically validated.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the SCOAT6 compared to select multidomain assessments comprising the Concussion Clinical Profile Screening (CP Screen), Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT), and Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screen (VOMS) in identifying athletes with sport-related concussion from healthy controls.

methodsThere were 134 participants (aged 13-29 years) within 3-30 days of sport-related concussion and 67 healthy controls who completed the SCOAT6 recommended components (e.g., Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory [PCSI], verbal cognitive tests, orthostatic vital signs, modified Balance Error Scoring System [mBESS], timed tandem gait, and modified VOMS [mVOMS]), optional screeners (e.g., Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7], Patient Health Questionnaire-2 [PHQ-2], Athlete Sleep Screening Questionnaire [ASSQ]), and other select multidomain assessments (e.g., CP Screen, ImPACT, VOMS) at their initial visit.

resultsPCSI, mVOMS, and timed tandem gait demonstrated acceptable to outstanding utility (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73-0.91) to identify sport-related concussion from controls, while the remaining SCOAT6 components demonstrated unacceptable utility (AUC < 0.70). Nearly all CP Screen, ImPACT, and VOMS components demonstrated acceptable to outstanding utility (AUC = 0.72-0.97), except for CP Screen anxiety/mood, ImPACT reaction time, and VOMS near point of convergence distance (AUC < 0.70).

conclusionsThe PCSI, timed tandem gait, and mVOMS components of the SCOAT6 were useful in identifying sport-related concussion. However, verbal cognitive tests, orthostatic vital signs, and clinical balance components were not useful for this purpose. The CP Screen, additional items from the full version of the VOMS, and ImPACT memory and processing speed were also useful in identifying sport-related concussion and should be included in a multidomain approach for the subacute assessment of sport-related concussion.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesBrain ConcussionAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPostural BalanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.