ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2025
An Enhanced Retention Strategy to Prevent the Vertical Transmission of HIV in Uganda: A Budget Impact Analysis.
Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNovel retention strategies have the potential to reduce vertical transmission of HIV and improve patient outcomes for women living with HIV (WLHIV) and their infants. We estimated the budget impact of the enhanced retention strategy (ERS) compared with the Ministry of Health strategy/standard of care (SOC) approach for preventing vertical transmission of HIV among women initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in late pregnancy in Uganda.
methodsA budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted from the payer (Uganda's Ministry of Health) perspective with a 5-year time horizon. A Microsoft Excel-based BIA model was populated with HIV epidemiological data and expenditures from the literature and the clinical trial of dolutegravir in pregnant HIV mothers and their neonates. These cost projections accounted for various programmatic inputs, disease progression, differences in mortality based on treatment status, and subsequent pregnancies. The eligible population included all HIV-positive pregnant women currently receiving prevention of vertical transmission services in Uganda. The primary outcomes of the analysis were incremental budget costs, and infections averted over 5 years.
resultsAdopting the ERS would lead to a net cost increase of US$63.8 million over the next 5 years, or a net cost increase of US$12.7 million per year compared with the SOC. Newly enrolled WLHIV accounts for US$39.5 million of these marginal costs, while in-system patients account for US$24.2 million. Direct programmatic costs of the ERS only account for 13% of this additional cost, with 87% of the marginal increase coming from the cost of providing ART for WLHIV who would otherwise be lost to follow-up. The ERS would avert an additional 6933 infant infections compared with the SOC.
conclusionImplementing the ERS would significantly increase the Ugandan Ministry of Health's budget, but most additional costs would be accrued from the resulting expansion of ART client volume. The ERS is a relatively low-cost intervention to reduce loss to follow-up rates among marginalized and hard-to-reach populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.