Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40483640›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2025

Cloacal exstrophy management in a  low- and middle-income country (LMIC): comparative outcomes of direct versus staged closure and a multidisciplinary risk-stratified protocol.

Adrià Costa-Roig, Emilio Fernández-Portilla, Alfredo Domínguez-Muñóz, Fernando González-Ledón, Elias Ramírez-Velazquez, Andrés Menjívar-Rivera, Norma Briseño-Chavarría, Rosalinda López-Rodríguez, Roberto Dávila-Pérez

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adrià Costa-RoigDepartment of Paediatric Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico. adriacostaroig@gmail.com.
Emilio Fernández-PortillaDepartment of Paediatric Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alfredo Domínguez-MuñózDepartment of Paediatric Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fernando González-LedónDepartment of Paediatric Urology, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Elias Ramírez-VelazquezDepartment of Paediatric Urology, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Andrés Menjívar-RiveraDepartment of Paediatric Urology, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Norma Briseño-ChavarríaDepartment of Paediatric Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rosalinda López-RodríguezDepartment of Paediatric Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Roberto Dávila-PérezDepartment of Paediatric Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCloacal exstrophy represents a significant challenge for pediatric surgeons. A critical component of treatment involves bladder closure and reconstruction of the urethra, genitalia and pubic symphysis. The objective of this study is to describe and compare outcomes of patients with cloacal exstrophy based on the type of closure employed and to propose a multidisciplinary management protocol.

methodsA retrospective descriptive study was conducted on patients with cloacal exstrophy treated between 2008 and 2024. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and immediate post-operative (< 30 days) variables were recorded. The analysis was stratified into two groups based on the surgical approach: staged closure (SC) versus direct closure (DC).

resultsTwelve patients were evaluated. In the DC group (n = 5), three (60%) were male, with a mean birth weight of 2401 (± 488) g. The median age at the time of surgery was 9 days [interquartile range (IQR): 5526 days]. Cecal plate rescue was successfully achieved in 80% of cases, and the mean pubic diastasis was 4.65 (± 2.84) cm. The most frequent complication observed was surgical wound infection. In the SC group (n = 7), five (71.4%) were female, with a mean birth weight of 2046.67 (± 489.8) g. The median age at surgery was 62.5 days (IQR: 1116 days). Cecal plate rescue was successful in six (85.7%) patients, and the mean pubic diastasis was 5.16 (± 2.74) cm. The most common complication was surgical wound infection associated with external fixation. No statistically significant differences were observed.

conclusionThe outcomes of both techniques were comparable. In the DC group, males predominated, as this technique achieves greater phalloplasty length and was performed at an earlier age. The staged group included patients with higher risks of bladder closure dehiscence: lower birth weight, larger pubic diastasis, and associated cardiac comorbidities. This approach necessitates a specialized team of orthopedic surgeons for modern closure techniques, involving osteotomies and external fixators, which entail higher costs. Individualizing the surgical technique for bladder closure is critical. We recommend single stage closure for male neonates. A staged approach is advised for patients referred later in life with low birth weight, pubic diastasis > 5 cm, or hemodynamically significant cardiac comorbidities.

Indexed as

Anus, ImperforateBladder ExstrophyPlastic Surgery ProceduresUrologic Surgical ProceduresCloacal ExstrophyDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCloacal exstrophyDeveloping countriesPatient care teamReconstructive surgical proceduresSurgical wound infectionTreatment outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.